Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:37:42 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist ports/devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh Message-ID: <20040325033742.GA60717@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200403250423.47441.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403231422350.6103-100000@pancho> <200403240109.09430.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <40624417.5040209@fillmore-labs.com> <200403250423.47441.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 04:23:43AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > However, I would already be totally happy if we could just add a paragrap= h to=20 > the porter's handbook that says >=20 > "If a port maintainer requests that your port SHOULD install libtool arch= ives=20 > because another port needs them, you shall comply with his request." >=20 > To me, this seems like a workable and fair compromise and it would be a n= ice=20 > thing to point to if anybody feels like beating the dead horse again. We= =20 > wouldn't even need to change portlint's warnings that way. Sound good? That's quite reasonable. Kris --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAYlQGWry0BWjoQKURAvzuAKDDNXMOB/hXjWHLBNsPHOCaqiIhvwCgqEh5 vFiMJTfhelYbN/j5kpU25RI= =hSrT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040325033742.GA60717>