Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 20:55:22 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, ports@freebsd.org, gibbs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NO_PACKAGE and NO_CDROM Message-ID: <199604090355.UAA01777@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199604072110.OAA02134@freefall.freebsd.org> (gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* I don't have a problem with wcarchive using whatever collection it * wants to, but I think the other collections should stay. Hey, I don't have a problem with other collections staying, as long as it hasn't proven to be such a pain in the backside to maintain and synchronize correctly. Let's face it, in the long history of FreeBSD ports, there never has been a time when a new directory was added to the ports tree and everything, even within freebsd.org, was updated correctly (sample supfiles, wcarchive, etc.). Especially now, since we've got dozens of mirror sites all around the world, not to mention the people's own supfiles. I propose we reorganize them to exactly two collections: ports-all with release=cvs,current ports-distfiles with release=current and get it over with. :) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604090355.UAA01777>