Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:48:35 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: David Greenman <dg@root.com>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, msmith@mass.dis.org Subject: Re: NFS Patch #4 -- survived overnight test. (was Re: Found NFS data corruption bug... (was Re:...)) Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011213134619.66101H-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <200112131835.fBDIZuL70031@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Ok, here is the latest patch set. This patch set survived an > overnight run of the nfs torture test that Jordan posted... it > got through 597,000 test calls over NFSv3, 367,000 over NFSv2, and > 1.35 million on a local filesystem. Great! > I am going to forward port and test this stuff on -current today and > probably commit it to -current tonight, with a 3-day turn to -stable. Hmm. I'm OK with a commit to -CURRENT, but would really appreciate it if you made it a week before MFC to -STABLE. Given your statement just a few lines earlier about needing more review from VM types, that would allow a bit more time for necessary review. I agree, given the impending 4.5 release, we should MFC it as far before release as possible, but three days is a little below my threshold for sensitive NFS/file system changes :-). Thanks, Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011213134619.66101H-100000>