Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:05:44 +0200 From: "Dimitar Vasilev" <dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: setfib+pf Message-ID: <59adc1a0901062205l2bdaaa4enf6f08c0b6cd7f539@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, I'd like to ask on the best options for using setfib and pf in a non-BGP environment. I will run 2 uplinks, with VLANs for internal networks and want to fail over external links if one of them fails. Currently pf supports to the best of my knowledge: a) rtable - this means i can create the routing tables with setfib and then use pass from .... rtable N( N >1 <16) or give out directly network ranges b) route-to - pass in/out on X from ... route-to c) packet tagging - i can tag networks and use standalone or through routing tags. Anyone aware if is it ok to use /etc/gateways without running routed or how can i label routes alternatively? d) pass in from route N(192.168.1.1 from example) to... - saw this on http://www.mail-archive.com/pf@benzedrine.cx/msg07220.html and requires BGP to make tags speak anything but network numbers. e) use the vlan id's I'd much appreciate if someone thinks with me for the best options of using the setfib features along with pf. Thanks! Best regards, Dimitar Vassilev
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59adc1a0901062205l2bdaaa4enf6f08c0b6cd7f539>