Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 02:37:12 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: mishania@demos.net (Mikhail A. Sokolov) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: another ufs panic.. Message-ID: <199903281637.CAA21375@cheops.anu.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <19990328201339.A14768@demos.su> from "Mikhail A. Sokolov" at Mar 28, 99 08:13:39 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Mikhail A. Sokolov, sie said: > > On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 12:18:47AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > # > ...there have been substantial ufs improvements in 3.x, yes ? > # No. Nobody has been complaining about ufs. Hell, that's the fs we > # all use. We wouldn't be *able* to do anything if it was so buggy. > > You didn't look into at least 2 month old archives, did you? > Pardon to comment in such a useless way, but it sometimes hurt people wouldn't > read before answering. > > Darren, people who moved from 2.x to 3.x-stable are reporting nicely about > their systems, might be you should as well. Again, why did you use pax but > cpio and such? Because dump/restore weren't performing well with "cp /usr /mnt/usr" darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903281637.CAA21375>