Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:46:54 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Kruk <meshko@cs.brandeis.edu> To: Ernst de Haan <ernst@jollem.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, FreeBSD Java mailing list <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Performance hint for JDK on FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012011942130.23343-100000@daedalus.cs.brandeis.edu> In-Reply-To: <20001202013654.A61526@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Ok, I tested the JDK 1.1.8 with the AWTTest utility, and I wrote a new program > to see if the creation of a java.awt.Frame would perhaps take a longer amount > of time on 1.1.8. Not. It seems JDK 1.1.8 just perhaps heaps better than > 1.2.2... isn't it just known fact that 1.2 is all times worst in term of performance? Using Windows as a references system (since I don't have access to a single Sun machine), I've noticed that 1.1 is the fastest, 1.3 is acceptable and 1.2 is ... well, I try not to use it. I agree that native FreeBSD port of 1.1.8 show very decent performance. Even on an "averagely high" PIII-500 AWT functions show very-very good performance. So what I'm getting at is: do we need a 1.2 port or is it better to concentrate on 1.3? I might be missing something important of course... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.30.0012011942130.23343-100000>