Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:58:02 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fstack protector Message-ID: <20030411115522.I6045@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20030411111302.G4749@cvs.imp.ch> References: <20030411111302.G4749@cvs.imp.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Martin Blapp wrote: > Can't we add this to the gcc in the base_system for CURRENT ? > > It seems that OpenBSD 3.3 will contain this too as they > mention. > > Martin > > Martin Blapp, <mb@imp.ch> <mbr@FreeBSD.org> That'd work, except that then be dependant on the patch continuing to work during every gcc upgrade. One possible solution would be to have a gcc-ssp port which would build a SSP version of the base system's compiler, and call it gcc-ssp or something. Then we could make certain ports depend on using it, perhaps. The _real_ solution is for the gcc guys to integrate it into gcc 3.3, but I'm not sure how that could be made to happen. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030411115522.I6045>