Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 04:52:13 -0400 From: Joshua Lee <yid@softhome.net> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: nwestfal@directvinternet.com, dave@jetcafe.org, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why did evolution fail? Message-ID: <20020912045213.0915f496.yid@softhome.net> In-Reply-To: <3D7FF31D.642948C9@mindspring.com> References: <20020911140623.A45696-100000@Tolstoy.home.lan> <3D7FC334.396A9F12@mindspring.com> <20020911214015.51f915a0.yid@softhome.net> <3D7FF31D.642948C9@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:51:25 -0700 Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> wrote: > Joshua Lee wrote: > > > > Really? What *is* one divided by infinity? > > > Zero. > > And the converse, infinity divided by zero? ;-) > Actually, depending on who you ask, an undefined order of infinity; > the actual order depends on the inifinty you started with, and the > zero. ;^). I figured that it was a form of infinity. > > > for their arguments is likely to be wrong in ways that they are > > > incapable of understanding, until they learn more mathematics. > > > > And you say you're not a mathematician.... :-) > > I'm not. A real mathematician can easily smoke me on theory. > I merely know enough not to make stupid mistakes. I make smart > mistakes, instead. 8-) 8-). Smart mistakes are sometimes the worst ones. ;-) > > > > Yeah, and the concept of one hand clapping is perfectly rational > > > > to an irrationalist. So what? > > > > > > It's perfectly rational to the rationalist, as well. It is a > > > proof of the incompleteness theorem. > > > > Interesting... could you elaborate? > > Not without starting another thread... 8=O. I'd actually welcome a new thread, this thread is getting quite boring. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020912045213.0915f496.yid>