Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Dec 2000 07:37:52 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>
Cc:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: test/review: /dev/console logging patch 
Message-ID:  <25674.977121472@critter>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:19:11 %2B1100." <20001218101910.O83523@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20001218101910.O83523@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>, Peter Jeremy writes:

>
>I'm not offering code right now, but how about using a `newline or
>timeout' approach?  If there's a partial line and there's been no
>console output for some number of seconds, forward the line to log(9).

I played with this, and I was not happy with the result, if somebody
else can do it better, I'm open for patches...

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25674.977121472>