Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:09:57 +0000 From: Ian Dowse <iedowse@iedowse.com> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Alex Rodin <alx@sm.ukrtel.net>, David Coder <dacoder@dcoder.net>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb to serial Message-ID: <200611101109.aa29582@nowhere.iedowse.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:57:17 %2B0100." <200611101157.19387.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200611101157.19387.hselasky@c2i.net>, Hans Petter Selasky writes: >On Friday 10 November 2006 10:08, Maxim Konovalov wrote: >> The second question: is it OK to commit uark(4) as is and then convert >> it to the new model? > >I would prefer no. It is better to commit "uark(4)" to the USB p4 project, >than HEAD, because then we don't have to worry about integrating the driver. If the driver works, then there should be no need to hold off on committing it to -CURRENT. Having it in -CURRENT now allows it to be MFC'd to RELENG_6 sooner. From a quick glance it looks fine to me, so I'd say just go ahead and commit it Maxim. Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200611101109.aa29582>