Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:07:55 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <200311251507.55403.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <16322.46449.554372.358751@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <16322.26365.159173.946033@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200311251214.23290.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <16322.46449.554372.358751@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 12:20, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > OK my bad, it will probably slow down the ports building. > > I'll bet a larger percentage of our users build ports than need nss or > ldap. Err, yes.. Of course you are claiming it should be either/or, which is not very reasonable. What about the newer version of gcc? That is considerably slower than previous versions, but I don't see people screaming to have it removed. Most things are tradeoffs, this is one of them. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311251507.55403.doconnor>