Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:32:33 -0800 From: Peter Losher <Peter_Losher@isc.org> To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about a mirror site that is only locally accessible? Message-ID: <200411102332.44305.Peter_Losher@isc.org> In-Reply-To: <418DFC56.28551.D9D66C1@localhost> References: <418DFC56.28551.D9D66C1@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2472968.rlL0P86FCT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 07 November 2004 07:43 am, Dan Langille wrote: > Basically, if we don't do this, we lose our free hosting. So it's > pretty much a given that this is going to happen. I'm just putting > it out here so that it's all out in the open. If access was restricted to a country, that's fine (au and tw have been=20 doing it for ages), but to restrict it to a single IX troubles me. I am=20 all for offering private repositories as a service to IX customers, but=20 they shouldn't have freebsd.org CNAME's then. (they can be listed on=20 the mirrors list, etc.)=20 This is just my own opinion, and I am sure others will surely=20 disagree. :) Best Wishes - Peter =2D-=20 Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP Key E8048D08 | "The bits must flow" --nextPart2472968.rlL0P86FCT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBkxWcPtVx9OgEjQgRAh2CAJ9V2yveuvDa1NEJniro7AiNUQPIcgCfYGOP J6pUK9fkQn+1gZsfmkBoP8M= =nYGH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2472968.rlL0P86FCT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411102332.44305.Peter_Losher>