Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:37:40 +0530 From: Siddharth Prakash Singh <spsneo@gmail.com> To: Ray Mihm <ray.mihm@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, jeff@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Google SoC 2009 Idea Message-ID: <e8e9f3930902241107j2e53c9fai9942ab14167831f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1aa142960902241100u671d5f90u769ad98e08fabb43@mail.gmail.com> References: <e8e9f3930902240943o2e2f4b1bh34916b775692a26f@mail.gmail.com> <1aa142960902241100u671d5f90u769ad98e08fabb43@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ray Mihm <ray.mihm@gmail.com> wrote: >> Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler. >> I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD. >> Hence, I am not yet aware about the current support for Multicore >> Architectures. > > Talk to jeff@freebsd.org, the author of ULE. What are your opinions on this project? What is the scope of this project? > >> Linux Kernel 2.6.* currently supports SMP, SMT, NUMA architectures. Does the current scheduler has support for "CPU affinity/binding", mechanism for distinguishing varying capability of CPUs. > > These may be there already in ULE, although I'm not sure about NUMA. > > Ray > Waiting for your response, Siddharth -- Siddharth Prakash Singh http://www.spsneo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e8e9f3930902241107j2e53c9fai9942ab14167831f>