Date: 14 May 2002 23:39:06 +0100 From: "S. Roberts" <sroberts@dsl.pipex.com> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: man page for xntpd? Message-ID: <1021415949.41001.18.camel@Demon.Strobe.org> In-Reply-To: <20020514223418.GA8958@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1021405794.41001.10.camel@Demon.Strobe.org> <20020515075926.A43200@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <1021409993.41001.14.camel@Demon.Strobe.org> <20020514223418.GA8958@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-ypo6dP/2jZaOtQaD66fC Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dan, you're a Dude! That little piece of info makes all the difference. All the while here I was wondering what was going on with the stuff I'm reading, and here it is all making sense that both ntpd and xntpd refer to the same thing! Makes the reading much more clear, thanks a bunch! Stacey On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 23:34, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (May 14), S. Roberts said: > > Hi Jonathan, > > Thanks for the reply, and for the pointer. I've been to ntp.org's > > site, read what's there (for my circumstances) and I'm grateful for > > the information that's available there. > >=20 > > However, there's no reference to (not that was blantantly obvious to > > me) xntpd. I'll keep looking, though, thanks all the same. >=20 > xntpd is the old name. It's now called ntpd. >=20 > --=20 > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message --=20 Stacey Roberts B.Sc. (HONS) Computer Science Network Systems Engineer --=-ypo6dP/2jZaOtQaD66fC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dan, you're a Dude! That little piece of info makes all the difference. All the while here I was wondering what was going on with the stuff I'm reading, and here it is all making sense that both ntpd and xntpd refer to the same thing! Makes the reading much more clear, thanks a bunch! Stacey On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 23:34, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (May 14), S. Roberts said: > > Hi Jonathan, > > Thanks for the reply, and for the pointer. I've been to ntp.org's > > site, read what's there (for my circumstances) and I'm grateful for > > the information that's available there. > >=20 > > However, there's no reference to (not that was blantantly obvious to > > me) xntpd. I'll keep looking, though, thanks all the same. >=20 > xntpd is the old name. It's now called ntpd. >=20 > --=20 > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message - --=20 Stacey Roberts B.Sc. (HONS) Computer Science Network Systems Engineer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBPOGSCPdn4A8qiCO5EQInRQCdF317gO2s/1ORq0CzeiKYOYvg40kAniiO KAiPg+SoWDuJPhuXD/t2omaT =z1tk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ypo6dP/2jZaOtQaD66fC-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1021415949.41001.18.camel>