Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:04:33 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: wpaul@ctr.columbia.edu, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots) Message-ID: <861x5rqeym.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20050722011556.T16902@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's message of "Fri, 22 Jul 2005 01:17:52 %2B0100 (BST)") References: <20050721134816.GA8550@nagual.pp.ru> <20050722011556.T16902@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes: > I can't speak to the specifics of the driver, as I neither use it nor > have any if_rl hardware. However, you should know that because > debug.mpsafenet=3D0 also changes quite a bit of timing, not just lock > coverage, it's not necessarily a locking problem. Out of curiousity, > if you take "options PREEMPTION" out, but leave debug.mpsafenet=3D1, do > things change? I have a box with rl hardware and mpsafenet enabled. No problems so far, but it's not under heavy load. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?861x5rqeym.fsf>