Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:39:09 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: devel/gettext further update
Message-ID:  <4C0820FD.4080104@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100603211712.GA93843@nagual.pp.ru>
References:  <A70E715E-E554-4106-AA61-D7004BFFAF4A@FreeBSD.org> <20100603113023.GA99400@nagual.pp.ru> <4C07A268.605@gmx.de> <4C07F46D.2040205@FreeBSD.org> <20100603211712.GA93843@nagual.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/03/10 14:17, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:29:01AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 06/03/10 05:39, Matthias Andree wrote:
>>> Am 03.06.2010 13:30, schrieb Andrey Chernov:
>>>
>>>> security/libksba
>>>> security/libgcrypt
>>>> (they use libgpg-error)
>>
>> So libgpg-error needs to be bumped, but why do things that don't like
>> directly with gettext need it? One of the major benefits of shared
>> libraries is to avoid pointless recompiling.
>
> libgpg-error is bumped already. But those libraries are linked to the old
> libintl comes from libgpg-error

If they are linked against the old libintl then yes, they need to be 
bumped ... where they got the linkage from is not relevant. :)


Doug

-- 

	... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
			-- Propellerheads

	Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
	a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C0820FD.4080104>