Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Feb 2016 07:35:41 -0800
From:      Brian Gardner <openjdk@getsnappy.com>
To:        Magnus Ihse Bursie <magnus.ihse.bursie@oracle.com>
Cc:        java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Helping out with JDK 9 on BSD
Message-ID:  <48E788C9-8AE8-41EC-8AEC-54FD53B91B19@getsnappy.com>
In-Reply-To: <56AFE270.5010502@oracle.com>
References:  <56ADE7D4.8020107@oracle.com> <56ADE943.6020103@oracle.com> <8B9ACABA-F9B2-4288-9DB5-CA843DE48C34@getsnappy.com> <08F78FBA-70D2-4819-99BB-05476638726C@getsnappy.com> <56AF48F1.4070506@oracle.com> <0B79DC9D-2379-4B42-9923-0ECC7CB28D22@getsnappy.com> <56AFD7FA.3090103@oracle.com> <56AFDC30.7070800@oracle.com> <56AFE270.5010502@oracle.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I=92ve been working on getting the debug build running.  I=92m stuck on =
a SIGBUS error trickling up from a new test, test_safefetch32 at =
StubRoutines.cpp line:599.  It seems like it=92s trying to test an =
passing an invalid address but expects to get a response and to be able =
to handle it, but can=92t.  I haven=92t looked into the change sets yet =
to determine what they are trying to achieve with this new code, and =
what the expected behavior is.  I=92ll continue with that tomorrow.

Brian

> On Feb 1, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie =
<magnus.ihse.bursie@oracle.com> wrote:
>=20
> On 2016-02-01 23:29, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> On 2016-02-01 23:11, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =
"freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>=20
>> I'm not sure what's happening here. My emails are being stripped of =
content. :-( I'll try to resend using my private SMTP server.
> Didn't work either. I give up. Seems the content is filtered by =
mailman? :(
>=20
> I'll try to post a few highlights anyway:
>=20
> This might be due to a different interpretation/implementation of =
pthreads in FreeBSD, see e.g. =
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads/2009-June/004563.html.=
 I can't really say this situation applies (I can't find usages of =
pthread_key_delete) but maybe there's a similar issue.
>=20
> One approach would be to compile a debug build (configure =
--enable-debug) and see if the "initializing TLS more than once" assert =
is triggered.
>=20
> Or try recompiling with -DUSE_LIBRARY_BASED_TLS_ONLY. I don't think it =
should matter, but maybe.
>=20
> /Magnus
>=20
>>=20
>> /Magnus
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =
"freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>=20




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48E788C9-8AE8-41EC-8AEC-54FD53B91B19>