Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:45:47 +0300
From:      Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
To:        Adrian Gschwend <ktk@netlabs.org>
Cc:        freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Subject:   (no subject)
Message-ID:  <E1KINR5-000H9k-PG@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:37:01 %2B0200 .

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Danny Braniss wrote:
> 
> > the patches were for -STABLE, and I haven't seen them, but
> > before the patches, try increasing the tag opening, ie
> > camcontrol tags daX -N128
> > or via iscontrol (and yes it's not idiot proof, nor is is it
> > developer proof  :-) 
> 
> ok ;) Did that (camcontrol), with the following result:
> 
> Operations performed:  6006 Read, 3994 Write, 12800 Other = 22800 Total
> Read 93.844Mb  Written 62.406Mb  Total transferred 156.25Mb  (1.4742Mb/sec)
>    94.35 Requests/sec executed
> 
> which is already a lot better but still below the IO of the local disk.
> Should I try more right now or should I wait for more progress in that?
> 
The numbers should be close to what you get via NFS :-(
a) sysctl debug.iscsi_initiator should be <= 3
b) can you send me the command line to run sysbench?

> Does it make sense to switch to -CURRENT for that?

no, it's runing ok on -stable and have not tried it on -current yet.

> 
> cu
> 
> Adrian
> 

danny





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1KINR5-000H9k-PG>