Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:22:35 +0200 From: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/57167: [new port] news/inn-current: Developpement version inn. Message-ID: <20031006172235.2ebe6f8a.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <20031006151450.GX47415@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <200310061255.h96CtkQo019916@freefall.freebsd.org> <20031006151450.GX47415@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6 Oct 2003 11:14:50 -0400
Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
Hi !
> Any particular reason this is inn-current and not inn-devel? Most
> other development versions get -devel these days. I know it doesn't
> much matter, but consistency can be reassuring I guess ::)
In fact I respect INN naming convention.
Like FreeBSD, inn has release/stable/current version.
Since I'm hosting the snapshot. I can rename the package to
inn-DEVEL-${snapshot}. If so, I've just to set BRANCH to devel ;-) (to
keep consistency between ports)
regards,
clem
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031006172235.2ebe6f8a.sheepkiller>