Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:41:51 -0500
From:      michael copeland <michael.copeland@gmail.com>
To:        Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: please remove all search results with name Constantin Stalzer
Message-ID:  <338cd6e40902101741p7835dc0dpff6dcb3d9b24da0c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49922C12.2010201@ibctech.ca>
References:  <1115427411@web.de> <e9da18930902101329y7deff92bj692d57f39fcdd1dc@mail.gmail.com> <20090210233640.GA70071@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <e9da18930902101633j587f3f18x11fbc13f7b8d7dfd@mail.gmail.com> <20090211004106.GA70295@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <e9da18930902101713k2879842ah32728e4fe46f800a@mail.gmail.com> <49922C12.2010201@ibctech.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca> wrote:

> Chris Knight wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@msu.edu>
> wrote:
> >> To make fun of someone's ignorance is not humorous.
> >> It is offensive and small.
> >
> > We are going to have to agree to disagree.
>
> I read in a posting recently by a very, very prominent and respected
> member of the Internet community that agreeing to disagree is very
> disrespectful.
>
> In other words, you are accepting the fact that someone is wrong without
> finding a solution.
>
> Jerry made a very valid point. Jerry has made countless hundreds of
> posts to this list, many of which are directed at helping the newcomer
> settle in. _Any_ poking fun at someone whatsoever is unacceptable, and
> that is non-disputable.
>
> > It is my opinion that to
> > make fun of someone's _stupidity_ is offensive.  Stupidity, like the
> > lack of a sense of humor, is a disability that can not be cured.
> > Ignorance, which is easily cured, is something that we all suffer from
> > time to time and is therefore a more universal point of humor.
>
> It is not a point of humour to those who do not know any better. A
> softer, more gentle approach would be appropriate here.
>
> Even if *you* think it is humorous, have you ever known anyone, or had
> any children with any sort of anxiety issues? I'm sure you haven't, or
> you wouldn't be arguing with Mr. McAllister, and you surely wouldn't be
> defending your post.
>
> Perhaps by "have to agree to disagree" means that you will rephrase a
> response to the OP directly that explains the 'hows' and 'whys' of the
> non-feasibility of the request...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>

on a side note, i can't believe this has kept going

-- 

Doug Larson  - "Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it
might be better to change the locks."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?338cd6e40902101741p7835dc0dpff6dcb3d9b24da0c>