Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 06 Dec 2000 16:59:04 -0600
From:      "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net>
To:        <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, dburr@borg-cube.com, sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ports/23259: Please remove the following redundant ports.
Message-ID:  <4.3.2.20001206164925.00ac7350@207.227.119.2>
In-Reply-To: <200012040958.eB49w8n97022@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:58 AM 12/4/00 -0800, sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG wrote:
>Synopsis: Please remove the following redundant ports.
>
>State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
>State-Changed-By: sobomax
>State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 4 01:53:41 PST 2000
>State-Changed-Why:
>p5-ApacheDBI and ripit-atapi were removed. As for x11amp I'm not sure, because
>last time when I proposed to nuke it several people popped up complaining
>that xmms is too bloated and doesn't really have any advantages over 
>x11amp for
>those who just want to have a little mp3 player for x11.

If databases/p5-ApacheDBI was removed should not p5-ApacheDBILogConfig and 
p5-ApacheDBILogger move to www, which is where I felt they should have gone 
at first.  Otherwise, why should www/p5-Apache-DBI not move to databases.

Not trying to start a religious debate here, but the 3 ports are closely 
related.  The 2 new ones should move, as the other has resided there for 
some time.


Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the power to serve



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.20001206164925.00ac7350>