Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 07:50:09 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: ru@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: bp@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, imp@harmony.village.org Subject: Re: -STABLE kernel build broken? Message-ID: <200105211450.f4LEo9u99496@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20010521171532.A8510@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 17:15:32 +0300
>From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
[I note that I included -current by mistake; I had intended to include
-stable. But since the thread has started.... dhw]
>On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:01:19AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> Seems that perhaps the MFC of some changes to mbuf.h also needed some
>> corresponding changes elsewhere (such as netncp/ncp_rq.c).
>> /usr/src/sys/sys/mbuf.h is:
>> * $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.44.2.9 2001/05/21 07:01:44 bp Exp $
>> and /usr/src/sys/netncp/ncp_rq.c is:
>> * $FreeBSD: src/sys/netncp/ncp_rq.c,v 1.1 1999/10/02 04:06:17 bp Exp $
>> (The latter is up to 1.7 in -CURRENT.)
>1.3 without M_WAIT -> M_TRYWAIT should work.
OK; I extracted 1.3 & tried it, when that broke, I figured out what you
meant by "without M_WAIT -> M_TRYWAIT", and did a global change
("%s/M_TRYWAIT/M_WAIT/g", for other vi-speakers). And that worked;
kernel built & installed, and I'm installing the world at the moment.
Thanks,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org
As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to
advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal
amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105211450.f4LEo9u99496>