Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:33:11 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml@t-b-o-h.net> To: davidb@boothscientific.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA1.5 Available... Message-ID: <200710260433.l9Q4XBdx049302@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> In-Reply-To: <200710252319.27118.davidb@boothscientific.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On Thursday 25 October 2007, Ken Smith wrote: > > Sorry, I had a bit of a false start with 7.0-BETA1. I've got sets > > of build machines used for the Monthly Snapshots and procedures in > > place to try and minimize the mistakes I could make while doing > > those Snapshots (previously one set for HEAD, one set for > > RELENG_6). The set of machines I'll be using for the 7.0-RELEASE > > build are the ones that had previously been doing the HEAD > > snapshots and I missed doing one very important adjustment to the > > build routine while doing the BETA1 builds, which resulted in the > > builds being based on HEAD. I didn't notice during the tests I do > > before uploading it because the build procedure makes most things > > (e.g. uname) say what you told it to build, you need to look harder > > to discover that sort of mistake. So, 7.0-BETA1 actually should > > have been called something more like 8.0-SURPRISE... :-( > > > > Sorry for the screw-up. > > > > This change seems to break portupgrade. It complains that it cannot > parse the output of uname. I think it is not capable of handling the > 1.5 after the BETA. > I hadn't tried that... When you do build a new kernel, it goes back to BETA1 though. Tuc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200710260433.l9Q4XBdx049302>