Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 22:21:11 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Ken Key <key@cs.utk.edu> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot floppies for 2.2.5-STABLE that speak PCMCIA? Message-ID: <199711210521.WAA13098@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199711210408.XAA26400@duncan.cs.utk.edu> References: <199711202148.OAA11511@mt.sri.com> <199711210408.XAA26400@duncan.cs.utk.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> version and branching terminology. So is it accurate to say that > 2.2.5-STABLE == the head of the cvsup RELENG_2_2 tag? Yes. > Does the > 2.2-STABLE that Brain Handy meantion == 2.2.5-STABLE or are they > actually separate branches? 2.2-STABLE became 2.2.5-STABLE as soon as 2.2.5-RELEASE was made (or soon thereafter). > > I don't think there have been any SNAP's that have been made since 2.2.5 > > was released, so any 2.2 SNAPS won't have any post-2.2.5R changes in > > them. > > releng22.freebsd.com and current.freebsd.com have new 2.2-*-SNAP daily > directories for the past few weeks. Your statement above makes it > sound like they are not the result of the RELENG_2_2 tag at the time > of the auto checkout/build but just 2.2.5-RELEASE? But I'm building > from source, so it doesn't matter to me. I had heard that both machines were 'down', so was not aware that they had started up again. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711210521.WAA13098>