Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 08:03:37 GMT From: Csaba Banhalmi <banhalmi@field.hu> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: i386/68719: usb 2.0 mobil rack+ fat32 performance problem Message-ID: <200407060803.i6683bM3003124@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200407060810.i668AITa070198@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 68719 >Category: i386 >Synopsis: usb 2.0 mobil rack+ fat32 performance problem >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-i386 >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Jul 06 08:10:18 GMT 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Csaba Banhalmi >Release: 4.10 >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD Field.hu 4.10-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE #5: Wed Jun 23 22:45:47 CEST 2004 banhalmi@Field.hu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Field i386 >Description: i tried to copy files via usb 2.0 to my usb 2.0 mobil rack, but with fat32 file system the performance was terrible.. ~1M/s fat32 is important to me, because of windows compatibility. i checked the performance with ufs fs, it had 10M/s peak, which is bad too. However i still need fat32 mainly. >How-To-Repeat: use usb 2.0 mobil rack with a fast hdd and ehci driver on 4.10 or 5.2 rls >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407060803.i6683bM3003124>