Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Jun 1996 11:37:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:      (Mark J. Taylor) <mtaylor@cybernet.com>
To:        Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
Cc:        Kurt Olsen <kurto@tiny.mcs.usu.edu>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: de0: Transmission timeout?
Message-ID:  <XFMail.960628113945.mtaylor@cybernet.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.92.960627150803.8567m-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 19:09:20 Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>>Hmmm, I'm a bit skeptical of this explanation, for the following reason.
>The same kernel and source tree is on 4 identical boxes (4 P120's), and
>the 1 P6, and the P6 only has this problem.  Swapping cards and slots
>doesn't fix it either, it's only on the P6.
>
>So I'm thinking a hardware problem of somekind, but I can't imagine what.
>3com cards work fine, the adaptec works fine, just the darn network card.
>
>On Thu, 27 Jun 1996, Kurt Olsen wrote:
>
>> I've seen this same behavior and a knowledgable friend tells me it's a
>> common bug.  Claims that it expires the arp entry for the default router,
>> so you can't talk to it from anywhere outside the subnet.  A work-around
>> is to have either a cron job that pings out of your subnet every few minutes,
>> or just do what I do and:
>>
>> % ping -i 300 <somedistanthost> >& /dev/null &
>>
>> I haven't look into the kernel to see if this is the case though, but the
>> ping does the job (as well as logging in from the console, then telneting
>> out.)
>>
>> Kurt
>>


I too have only experienced this on our one P6-200.  We have several P5 machines
with the SMC Ethernet (de0), and they do not exhibit this message.

Sounds like a loop-counter in the de driver code instead of a sleep().


-Mark Taylor
mtaylor@cybernet.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.960628113945.mtaylor>