Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:30:39 -0700 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday Message-ID: <200004232030.NAA51633@mass.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 23 Apr 2000 11:55:08 PDT." <200004231855.LAA63309@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I wonder if it makes sense to add a release id to the module header > and have the module loader refuse (unless forced) to load modules that > are out-of-date with the kernel? We actually have a whole module dependancy and versioning system more or less ready to go into -current. It could have gone in for 4.0, but we wouldn't have had time to test it. I would avoid rolling anything half-assed at this point in time. BTW; whilst I think Poul was entirely the wrong person to raise the issue, I agree that you probably want to hang back on MFCing the linux scripting changes for a week or so. This is really just common sense. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004232030.NAA51633>