Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 09:36:53 -0600 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The curtain is going down on 2.1-stable in 5 days! Message-ID: <l0301060daea903e2acc9@[208.2.87.4]> In-Reply-To: <10583.847464619@time.cdrom.com> References: Your message of "Fri, 08 Nov 1996 09:55:51 EST." <Pine.3.89.9611080953.A19812-0100000@solar.os.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Thanks for the "heads-up." What is the proper method for keeping a >> 2.1.5-RELEASE kernel up to date? Is it 2.1-STABLE (via sup) until the 12th >> or is another method recommended? > >2.1-stable via CVSup (recommended over sup) or CTM, yes. Both will be >maintained right up until the end (and, in the case of the former, for >some time afterwards since a tag's a tag). And in the case of the latter, no changes == no mail :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l0301060daea903e2acc9>