Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:42:21 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading -CURRENT and will downgrade GNOME to 2.6... Message-ID: <1092508940.36842.14.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20040814182634.GZ96458@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <opscqfb51e9aq2h7@mezz> <20040814173711.GY96458@toxic.magnesium.net> <opscqgt1kq9aq2h7@mezz> <20040814182634.GZ96458@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-tbG18CPWgEPeLtRpxZEx Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 14:26, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >> (08.14.2004 @ 1343 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 1.4K: << > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:37:11 -0400, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>= =20 > > wrote: > >=20 > > >>>(08.14.2004 @ 1310 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 1.0K: << > > >>When I am done with the ruby-gtk2/gnome2 update, then do you want me = to > > >>test with gnome_upgrade.sh for GNOME 2.6 -> 2.7.x? Unless, it's alrea= dy > > >>well tested by adamw and/or whomever. If nobody reply on this part, =20 > > >>then I > > >>will do the 'rm -rf /usr/local/* /usr/X11R6/* /compat/linux/* > > >>/var/db/pkg/*' and do the clean install instead gnome_upgrade.sh, =20 > > >>because > > >>it is faster than portupgrade when do the big upgrade. > > >>>end of "Upgrading -CURRENT and will downgrade GNOME to 2.6..." from = =20 > > >>>Jeremy Messenger << > > > > > >I run full gnome_upgrade.sh upgrades every 2 or 3 days or so, > > >alternating between 4.x and 5.x. > >=20 > > Isn't it why your machine has died from that? Poor your dear machine. ;= -) >=20 > Hehehehehe! I do those runs on the jails that Joe set up for me. >=20 > > >Unless there are errors, I run in the following order: > > >* clean 2.6 install > > >* clean 2.7 install > > >* clean 2.7-experimental install > > >* 2.6 -> 2.7 upgrade run > > >on 5-CURRENT and then 4-STABLE. > >=20 > > package or ports or both? If you haven't test with package, then I can = do =20 > > it here at the same time test by run desktop to see if it functions fin= e. >=20 > Only ports. We need to be more aggressive in testing packages since that's what will give us the edge with attracting new users, as well as give us a good first impression when it comes to review time. Since 5.3-RELEASE is coming soon, we need to be very sure our packages do the right thing.=20 You can expect Eugenia to rake us over the coals in a review otherwise. That said, I have done a GNOME 2.7 package install a few times with good success. I haven't gotten any feedback on the 2.6 packages good or otherwise. Hopefully that means they work. Joe >=20 > # Adam >=20 >=20 > -- > Adam Weinberger > adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org > adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org > http://www.vectors.cx > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-tbG18CPWgEPeLtRpxZEx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBHl0Mb2iPiv4Uz4cRAuPnAKCU19qZVZWsQaBH+lP/ooC/TKZN/wCfSkEt yluf8kEbV/NX9+k2VSG+DG4= =j/8b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tbG18CPWgEPeLtRpxZEx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1092508940.36842.14.camel>