Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:52:44 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rand() is broken Message-ID: <20030204105244.GA90241@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030204095839.GB87303@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20030202070644.GA9987@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030202090422.GA59750@nagual.pp.ru> <20030203002639.GB44914@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030203100002.GA73386@nagual.pp.ru> <20030204054020.GA2447@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030204094659.GA87303@nagual.pp.ru> <20030204095839.GB87303@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:58:40 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:46:59 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > > Returning to current algorithm, I am interested in good NSHUFF value in > > the range 100-2000. Do you have any findings there? > > Apparently 100 is not enough too, I see repeated pattern in your > program. I'll try other values... Well, I find that bigger values are not better, it means that algorithm limit is reached, so just 100 is good enough... -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030204105244.GA90241>