Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:27:37 +1000 From: John Marshall <john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Heimdal in 8.0 Message-ID: <20091002082737.GO37304@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20090820232237.GH2675@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au> References: <20090820232237.GH2675@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--IbA9xpzOQlG26JSn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, 09:22 +1000, John Marshall wrote: > Is there a good reason why we don't include the current Heimdal 1.2.1 > release with the FreeBSD 8.0 base? Heimdal 1.2.1 was released just over > 12 months ago and includes fixes to the 1.1.0 version which is currently > included with FreeBSD 8.0. >=20 > I was not able to get gssapi authentication working with an OpenLDAP > server on an 8.0-BETA2 server until I installed Heimdal 1.2.1 (via a > hacked port) and re-built OpenLDAP against that. Note that I have since been able to get the OpenLDAP/gssapi combination working with the 8.0 base Heimdal (1.1.0) by applying the following patch, rebuilding the base Heimdal and rebuilding security/cyrus-sasl2 against the base Heimdal. <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dbin/139037>; --=20 John Marshall --IbA9xpzOQlG26JSn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkrFuXkACgkQw/tAaKKahKLz/wCfR7QoTUvNrnUT8BhsrhEB7yPf r0AAn3h19j+Uk8aD0a4YuSNHJdnD8hIN =KP5R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IbA9xpzOQlG26JSn--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091002082737.GO37304>