Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:55:17 -0500
From:      Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>
To:        Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: -CURRENT and XFree86 4.0.2 problem
Message-ID:  <20010201115517.V479@puck.firepipe.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010201104723.F923@FreeBSD.org>; from ade@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:47:23AM -0600
References:  <20010123101200.B542@naver.co.id> <20010131115547.C2268@webcom.it> <200101311336.f0VDaTk81098@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010131152541.F2268@webcom.it> <20010201050902.L479@puck.firepipe.net> <20010201104723.F923@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--7Rldj+JZnTQmDdGi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:47:23AM -0600, Ade Lovett wrote:
> In fact, that's what X-aware ports do on bento anyway, so if you're
> installing packages, there may very will be "interesting"
> inconsistencies.

*sigh*

> I've said it before, and I'll say it again..  x11/XFree86-4 is an
> anchronism that needs to die, or at least turn into a metaport.
> It's also not prefix-safe, seeing as how it dumps a load of
> stuff into /etc/X11 (my / partition is read-only, with symlinks
> for a few things that really do need to be read/write).

I agree.

> Failing that, and given that various mailing lists are full of
> people having major problems with XFree86 4.0.2, the whole damn
> thing should be backed out to 4.0.1 (which worked), repo-copy
> over to x11/XFree86-4-devel (or something) with 4.0.2, and then
> those that want to sit down and nail the problems can do so,
> without affecting the majority of end-users that probably could
> care less about 4.0.1 vs 4.0.2 -- they just want an X that *works*.

Well, what about other interests?  I need X4.0.2 myself because 4.0.1
and earlier don't have support for my video card (not very good anyway).
I'd say people should stick to 3.x if they want an X that works.  4.x
people can submit bugs to XFree86 and patches to jmz.

--=20
wca

--7Rldj+JZnTQmDdGi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6eZT0F47idPgWcsURAsPHAJ9vhpUxgbe/GJd/DP2UQKurhRABGACeO+mh
/KUDw8ojpfpxG6t9WMyR9Go=
=G5ZZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7Rldj+JZnTQmDdGi--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010201115517.V479>