Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Jun 1996 16:41:21 -0400
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Statically linked vs. Dynamically linked programs (fwd)
Message-ID:  <9606072041.AA09707@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199606072018.NAA03901@phaeton.artisoft.com>
References:  <Pine.LNX.3.91.960607224136.3823F-100000@ccslinux.dlsu.edu.ph> <199606072018.NAA03901@phaeton.artisoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 7 Jun 1996 13:18:37 -0700 (MST), Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> said:

[about executables linked -shared]

> 	o	library data in image

I believe this to be incorrect.  This is a correct description of the
way Sun's libraries work, but my understanding was that we avoid
this.

> 	o	shared library image mmap'ed into process address
> 		space on startup by modified crt0.o

No.  /usr/libexec/ld.so loader image mmap'ed into process address
space on startup by crt0.o.  Shared library images are mmaped by
ld.so.

> 	o	library code is PIC (Position Independent Code) to
> 		allow mapping anywhere for any process.  PIC is
> 		slower than statically linked code for Intel
> 		processors (artifact of DOS legacy, not a problem
> 		for most non-Intel chips)

Not an artifact of DOS legacy, but rather a result of the paucity of
registers on 8086-family CPUs.

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... 
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance.
Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence.  We like people
MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish.  - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9606072041.AA09707>