Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 00:28:42 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: "Robert V. Baron" <rvb@cs.cmu.edu>, wollman@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys bus.h bus_private.h conf.h devicestat.h module.h src/sys/kern bus_if.m device_if.m kern_con Message-ID: <19981205002842.A18661@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199812042022.NAA41883@harmony.village.org>; from Warner Losh on Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 01:22:55PM -0700 References: <199812041925.LAA29610@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <199812042022.NAA41883@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 01:22:55PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <199812041925.LAA29610@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Steve Kargl writes: > : Config(8) clearly states that you need to run "make depend". > > You should ***********NOT********** have to run make depend if your > are building a fresh kernel. Make depend shouldn't build files that > aren't otherwise built. It doesn't. It only make sure that the order between the files is correct. > make depend needs to be run so that you don't have stale .o's, not to > generate silly .h files. As long as we're generating .h files (and we are and should be), I can't see any way of avoiding this without requiring large amounts of extra building or modifications to make. I believe we should be able to make 'make kernel' work from a clean tree, but if we are to support -j, we _need_ have a 'make depend' first. If people don't run config -r, we _need_ a 'make depend' first. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981205002842.A18661>