Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:45:32 -0400
From:      Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com>
To:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Suggestion for dns/bind910 pkg-message
Message-ID:  <8B6840D2-1813-4F67-836F-FDB0EBE09660@distal.com>
In-Reply-To: <0805B38FA994050714A31A49@atuin.in.mat.cc>
References:  <18B4A4CB-42D2-4577-A3F4-43EEE430CEB3@distal.com> <0805B38FA994050714A31A49@atuin.in.mat.cc>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

  Right.  Well, it mentions chroot, which may or may not be correct or =
relevant
depending on the outcome of that issue.  But, even after that, the =
statement
about the existence of /etc/rc.d/named, which doesn't and won't exist, =
was
more the point I was making.

  But thanks.  Just wanted to note it, clearly you have bigger issues =
you're
looking at as well.  :-)

                       - Chris

On Apr 20, 2014, at 11:41 , Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> +--On 20 avril 2014 11:18:35 -0400 Chris Ross =
<cross+freebsd@distal.com>
> wrote:
> |=20
> |   The pkg-message in dns/bind910 (actually, bind9*) includes text =
about
> | setting up a chroot environment, and configuring rdns.  At the end, =
it
> | says:
> |=20
> |> The /etc/rc.d/named script in the base will do both for you.
> |=20
> |   In FreeBSD 10, this is not true.  There is no /etc/rc.d/named =
script.
> | I think this message should be adjusted so that it doesn't display
> | misinformation on a FreeBSD 10 system (perhaps just by changing it's
> | wording, as I don't know that there's a way in ports to do =
conditional
> | messages, but).
>=20
> Yes, I know, but before removing it, I'm still pondering on adding =
back the
> chroot support to BIND on FreeBSD >=3D 10.
>=20
> --=20
> Mathieu Arnold




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8B6840D2-1813-4F67-836F-FDB0EBE09660>