Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 02:40:58 +0900 From: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa <y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp> To: mike@smith.net.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: MIHIRA Sanpei Yoshiro <sanpei@sanpei.org> Subject: Re: PAO Integration? Message-ID: <199812121740.CAA08579@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 12 Dec 1998 16:06:54 JST." <199812120706.QAA22991@lavender.sanpei.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> PAO's assign_io function in pccardd/cardd.c has related code but > it's comment is ``XXX -- dirty hack for some 'ed' cards that have > incomplete iomem CIS tupples.'' > But FreeBSD-current's assign_io function does not have it. This PAO enhancement is dirty hack, but some PC-Card has these broken CIS. So, we need it. Another problem, some PC-Card has non-ascii charactor in CIS Version 1 info. So, -current pccardd can't match pccard.conf of this card. PAO enhace pccardd, can use regex in pccard.conf. I think, "PAO is not best answer. But it is necessary." Is PAO Integration necessary? Yes, some PAO enhancement is very useful and needs in some case. Some patch of PAO, it shuld be merge to -current. -- NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp nakagawa@jp.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812121740.CAA08579>