Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 13:51:09 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ABI is broken?? Message-ID: <20001105135109.A29323@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <200011020426.XAA01712@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 11:26:33PM -0500 References: <3A005026.47B9978C@FreeBSD.org> <200011011835.eA1IZl207585@vashon.polstra.com> <3A006A58.E8315ABA@FreeBSD.org> <200011012019.PAA97860@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20001101144355.A75475@dragon.nuxi.com> <200011020426.XAA01712@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20001102 05:30], Garrett Wollman (wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) wrote: ><<On Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:43:55 -0800, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> said: > >> Any reason to not get [libc ABI changes] in -current now and make >> the bump? > >Mostly because they're too small to be worth the pain. I'm waiting >for something more significant that I can piggy-back on. Which of course has the implicit risk that if something big doesn't show up these fixes will be added only at the nearing of 5.0-RELEASE and thus with less shake-down time. I also gather it has to do with the Austin project Garrett? -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl In my mind nothing makes sense... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001105135109.A29323>