Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:46:43 +0200 From: Matt Douhan <matt@fruitsalad.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why? Message-ID: <200408102346.43712.matt@fruitsalad.org> In-Reply-To: <20040810184401.V776@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org> <20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru> <20040810184401.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 23.44, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Spartak Radchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are > >> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th > >> performs atrociously: > >> > >> neptune# netstat -ni | head > >> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts > >> Oerrs Coll > >> em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1 > >> 10858513 > > > > I have no problems with em: > >> netstat -ni | head > > > > Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs > > Coll em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761 0 1709686290 > > 0 0 > > > >> uname -rs > > > > FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3 > > Against what type of switch? > Probably a linksys judging from his first line in the email Matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408102346.43712.matt>