Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:32:19 -0300 From: lioux@uol.com.br To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: lioux@uol.com.br, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk CONFIGURE_WRKDIR proposal Message-ID: <20000427133219.B476@Fedaykin.here> In-Reply-To: <vqcwvlkroke.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 12:27:29AM -0700 References: <20000427002216.A97999@Fedaykin.here> <vqcwvlkroke.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 12:27:29AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > > * Enough crap. I am submitting CONFIGURE_WRKDIR. This new > * VAR replaces WRKSRC as the directory the configure target changes > * (cd) to before running. > * For several PORTS (hugs, and soon to be ACE, just to name > * a few), this is necessary and has been acomplished with the use of > * configure SCRIPTDIR scripts and do-configure targets. > > That sounds fine, but I'd rather call it CONFIGURE_WRKSRC, since, > well, it replaces WRKSRC and not WRKDIR. :) I have no objections. Since, well, you are the Mk maintainer and you have much more experience than me. However, is SRC semantically better suited than DIR? Please, don't throw any stones, only peebles. This is my first major change and I would like it to go just right. Bottom of line, though, is that it is your call. I'll abide to anything you choose. (wink) Just do it in the next few days so that I can enjoy using it. HEheheh Should I write any explanatory notes or will you? For the Mk I mean. > * (hugs) to illustrate the new use (to be sincere, it is a patch, > > [warning: unbalanced parentheses :] Should check my builtin parser, or begin outsourcing. :) Regards, Mario Ferreira To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000427133219.B476>