Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 23:25:13 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: coredump@nervosa.com (Chris J. Layne) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: just a small observation Message-ID: <199605232125.XAA18951@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960523004642.1378A-100000@onyx.nervosa.com> from "Chris J. Layne" at "May 23, 96 00:48:14 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that Chris J. Layne said: > question, why does gcc cause ld to link in the libgcc library more than > once? And is there any reason it isn't using the shared gcc library? I don't know for the double call to libgcc but for the shared libgcc, we don't have one since early '95: ------------------------------------------------------------ phk 95/03/06 00:00:24 Modified: gnu/usr.bin/ld ld.c Log: Never again shall we link libgcc dynamic. It was a big mistake in the first place and we were too long in finding out. Now we know, and the damage is hard to fix. This is part one: ld will not link gcc dynamic, if specified as "-lgcc". Suggested by: dyson & davidg phk 95/03/06 00:04:06 Modified: gnu/usr.bin/cc/libgcc Makefile Log: Don't make the shared libgcc. I don't belive we need the libgcc_pic.a anymore, so I killed that as well. ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #2: Fri May 10 21:09:14 MET DST 1996
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605232125.XAA18951>