Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 10:49:46 +0100 From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> To: Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Swap on ZFS Message-ID: <CALfReyffOD0H9Xu2Exkk56SLA8hWnQNeYWsiRiQ5D2zvu=ar1g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5369C434.1090409@my.hennepintech.edu> References: <CAHAXwYA9NBsYTpUGCZ_5f%2B_qDuvS%2BbN9vE4GAZhpRhWVWCwi7g@mail.gmail.com> <53697D8B.2060906@gmail.com> <C1DCD8EEE8523B91197B6D82@192.168.1.50> <5369B4A1.40506@gmail.com> <5369B8A3.7020403@my.hennepintech.edu> <5369C376.7000307@gmail.com> <5369C434.1090409@my.hennepintech.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
the check summing of swap is quite a big deal in my opinion. You have your nice big server with ECC ram, but you do need to page some stuff in and out. Now you go and get some corruption on your disks, which you then feed back into your ram making the ecc irrelevant. On 7 May 2014 06:27, Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> wrote: > On 2014.05.07 00:24, Rolf Nielsen wrote: > > What would be the point of COW, snapshots and clones of swap? > None, but the flexibility wrt to size is what people want. Start big, > track usage, and resize as desired. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALfReyffOD0H9Xu2Exkk56SLA8hWnQNeYWsiRiQ5D2zvu=ar1g>