Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 19:27:08 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: max@wide.ad.jp Cc: max@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-CVSROOT@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org, max@wide.ad.jp Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/etlfont Makefile ports/x11/etlfont/files md5 ports/x11/etlfont/patches patch-aa ports/x11/etlfont/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST REQ CVSROOT modules ports/x11 Makefile Message-ID: <199701030327.TAA05440@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199701021935.EAA20464@mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp> (message from Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= on Fri, 03 Jan 1997 04:35:22 %2B0900)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* I just noticed that former PKGNAME was etlfont-noncjk, and so, I * changed it to etlfonts-noncjk. Though, should the module name also be * etlfonts-noncjk instead of etlfonts? That depends whether there are other "etlfonts" out there that may be ported, like etlfonts-jp-whatever. :) But yes, if there aren't any, I think "etlfonts" is cleaner. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701030327.TAA05440>