Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 08:24:52 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net> To: vallo@matti.ee Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: umount -f Message-ID: <199902111324.IAA25866@kot.ne.mediaone.net> In-Reply-To: <19990211144449.A45575@matti.ee> from Vallo Kallaste at "Feb 11, 1999 02:44:49 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vallo Kallaste once stated: =On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 01:54:53PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin <mi@misha.cisco.com> wrote: = => Nope: => => mi@xxx:/tmp (1044) umount -f -t nfs phosphorus:/phosphorus => umount: /phosphorus: Device busy => => It is not, that umount hangs, it is that it cares about the device being => busy despite `-f' flag. Or so it seems... send-pr? = =Do you have "hard" mount or "soft" mount? I have seen such behavior =for "hard" mounts. Soft. But it should not matter, should it? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902111324.IAA25866>