Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:30:54 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: secmgr <security@jim-liesl.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 as storage server with raid5? Message-ID: <20051209093054.GF912@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <4398CA29.3070602@jim-liesl.org> References: <20051208001857.68ac4fef.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <20051208133100.GC912@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20051208194915.GC948@unixpages.org> <4398CA29.3070602@jim-liesl.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--at6+YcpfzWZg/htY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:04:57PM -0700, secmgr wrote: > Whatever you do, don't complain about it on this list, or you'll just be= =20 > told that if you really wanted raid, you should be running SCSI disks=20 > and a raid adapter. They may allow that 3ware does ok, but no ATA drive= =20 > should ever be relied on and even s/w raid on scsi is only for ignorant= =20 > lusers who are too cheap to do the "right thing". > Those who think I run to hyperbole need only visit the archives. I know what you mean but I think this write-up is a bit too harsh. As long as the goal is to get _as reliable as possible_ without spending too much money, I think software RAID has its niche. Besides, I've seen a few hardware RAID controllers having issues themselves (and they weren't the cheapest ones available either). > One can only hope that gvinum actually works in 6 vs the buggy and=20 > incomplete alpha code that shipped in 5.x. Having a man page is nice,=20 > but I'd rather have a raid 5 set that didn't panic the system and=20 > corrupt the set when it lost a drive (and this with modern scsi drives=20 > and adapter). I haven't seen this (luckily!). I do know that sometime in 5.x there was a RAID-5 bug in gvinum but then again the whole vinum/gvinum transition was pretty dodgy back then. This is why I waited until 6.x to migrate. > I'd strongly suggest anyone using GEOM raid to do some=20 > fault insertion testing of their setup prior to actually relying on it. I did. It worked. --Stijn --=20 There are of course many problems connected with life, of which some of the most popular are 'Why are people born?', 'Why do they die?', and `Why do they spend so much of the intervening time wearing digital watches?' -- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy" --at6+YcpfzWZg/htY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDmU7OY3r/tLQmfWcRAryUAJoCHOjyFMKZrrq0/yPzdmcOj0xq0QCfbjMB Yo6ANci/i2latxjOZlUt3WY= =R8BN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --at6+YcpfzWZg/htY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051209093054.GF912>