Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:28:19 -0800
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dominic Fandrey <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de>
Cc:        Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Suggested improvements for ports
Message-ID:  <478930F3.2030309@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4788D0E6.7080007@gmx.de>
References:  <ED8842DFA28376008F3CA3A4@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <4788D0E6.7080007@gmx.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> 1) You can't build a dependent port and first set the config for the
>> options that you want.  So, when you select sasl in postfix, you never
>> get the chance to check the saslauthd option, for example.
> 
> As the ports man page states:
> 
> # make config-recursive
> 
> does what you want. It's surprising how often people claim this feature is
> missing, even though it has been there ever since I started using FreeBSD.

And it's surprising how often people don't listen when I explain that 
config-recursive is not a complete solution. :) It builds the list 
first, so that if you enable an option that creates a dependency on 
another port it will be missed. Portmaster does not have that limitation 
because it runs 'make config' before doing the dependency check for each 
port.

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?478930F3.2030309>