Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:23:53 +1000 From: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org> To: cokane@cokane.org Cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: mutex vm object not owned ... Message-ID: <421A5169.8050904@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <346a802205022108344070cf79@mail.gmail.com> References: <4219D4FE.8080501@freebsd.org> <346a802205022108344070cf79@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Coleman Kane wrote:
> panic: mutex vm object not owned at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_page.c:608
>0xd7cc1ac8: at panic+0x134
>0xd7cc1b68: at _mtx_assert+0x74
>0xd7cc1b88: at vm_page_remove+0x5c
>0xd7cc1ba8: at vm_page_free_toq+0xcc
>0xd7cc1bc8: at vm_page_free+0x28
>0xd7cc1be8: at uma_small_free+0x60
>0xd7cc1c18: at zone_drain+0x2e8
>0xd7cc1c58: at zone_foreach+0x64
>0xd7cc1c78: at uma_reclaim+0x20
>0xd7cc1c98: at vm_pageout_scan+0x200
>0xd7cc1d58: at vm_pageout+0x39c
>0xd7cc1d98: at fork_exit+0x118
>0xd7cc1dc8: at fork_trampoline+0xc
...
> Yeah, I've been seeing this as well (on my AMD64 machine) lately. Any
> idea where it is from?
Yes - it's rev 1.114 of uma_core.c. The comment "as the page(s)
undoubtedly came from kmem_map for those two." isn't true for the
UMD_MD_SMALL_ALLOC case.
It was assumed pre-1.114 that non-UMA_SLAB_KMEM were allocated with
NULL backing objects, which can be seen from amd64/amd64/uma_machdep.c:
void *
uma_small_alloc(uma_zone_t zone, int bytes, u_int8_t *flags, int wait)
{
...
*flags = UMA_SLAB_PRIV;
...
m = vm_page_alloc(NULL, colour++, pflags |
VM_ALLOC_NOOBJ);
...
Try backing out the couple of lines from that rev and see how it goes.
later,
Peter.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?421A5169.8050904>