Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:25:22 GMT From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 120664 for review Message-ID: <200705311425.l4VEPMIV020803@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=120664 Change 120664 by rwatson@rwatson_zoo on 2007/05/31 14:24:20 Fix comment, remove comment. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/trustedbsd/priv/sys/netipsec/ipsec_osdep.h#6 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/trustedbsd/priv/sys/netipsec/ipsec_osdep.h#6 (text+ko) ==== @@ -212,11 +212,9 @@ /* * 8. Test for "privileged" socket opened by superuser. * FreeBSD tests ((so)->so_cred != NULL && priv_check_cred((so)->so_cred, - * PRIV_NETINET_IPSEC, SUSER_ALLOWJAIL) == 0). + * PRIV_NETINET_IPSEC, 0) == 0). * NetBSD (1.6N) tests (so)->so_uid == 0). * This difference is wrapped inside the IPSEC_PRIVILEGED_SO() macro. - * - * XXXRW: Why was this suser_allowjail? */ #ifdef __FreeBSD__ #define IPSEC_IS_PRIVILEGED_SO(_so) \
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200705311425.l4VEPMIV020803>