Date: 02 Mar 2003 22:47:09 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> Cc: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.ORG>, portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GNOME 2.2 or GNOME 1.4 on 4.8 CDs? Message-ID: <1046663229.92914.86.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <3E62C6B5.8010501@btc.adaptec.com> References: <20030302190211.Z57064@freebsdmall.com> <3E62C6B5.8010501@btc.adaptec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-KcHS3Wnrb1PigjxLQ22f Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 22:06, Scott Long wrote: > Murray Stokely wrote: > > GNOME 1.4 is still listed in print-cdrom-packages.sh. Should this be > > updated to gnome 2.2? > >=20 > > - Murray >=20 > Can they both be offered and given separate menu items (post RC1)? > For now, maybe put 2.2 on the cd and see what breaks. dunno. 5.0 shipped with GNOME 2.0.2 as the default, and that seem to work just fine. Both desktops cannot coexist, but they are both fully-functional. You can certainly have a choice. But I strongly feel, and I know Maxim agrees, we should have 2.2 be the default on the first CD. Joe >=20 > Scott >=20 >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-KcHS3Wnrb1PigjxLQ22f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+YtA9b2iPiv4Uz4cRAn2xAJ9Ca9yFuv9/Xz9Q89KVFWEI1T0vtQCfXSTa /9epmhj3WUFw2S1W3HmDTzI= =ynK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KcHS3Wnrb1PigjxLQ22f-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1046663229.92914.86.camel>