Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:53:42 -0400 From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>, Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> Subject: Re: possible mountroot regression Message-ID: <CACqU3MW-69H22Sd_a9TLZ3k113TovK5HNM6D1kOUAMzrRBZeMg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wQ=o9%2B%2Bh4BEPWeY0BmadGGVZWRZB5rgzkAjPzQw29dwbA@mail.gmail.com> References: <4E984BF9.4000700@FreeBSD.org> <1318607697-31950-1-git-send-email-lacombar@gmail.com> <4E9DA38F.1040305@FreeBSD.org> <006E57CF-F21F-4245-935A-9F391F0BCBEA@xcllnt.net> <CABzXLYPsb_s1JwMrKux4m2%2BuH%2BYHLo=6i8z5_HPNRK98SNRTBA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPjTQNFfzxNscmzOsZ%2B6g=hscbqSXcfAi5MtUddATKzWKHVScg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110191305500.7138@wonkity.com> <CAGH67wQ31W=WVHYBGDZC_ReU3hdgB6CQCf8ANPJ0y5XW7Bo=jQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACqU3MV6T2ShBSWi%2BygK5BaZ=hfdmsM2ELkV73=T_PunL39Q2A@mail.gmail.com> <CAGH67wQ=o9%2B%2Bh4BEPWeY0BmadGGVZWRZB5rgzkAjPzQw29dwbA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wro= te: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wro= te: >>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wro= te: >>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/19/11, Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would you be able to commit a variant of this patch sans the 'x' p= art? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, soonish. If people like the 'x' change I can do that in a foll= owup >>>>>>> commit as well. I just need to know if people like it or not... >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, it's useful. But why not "q" for "quit" ? Just a bikeshed color >>>>>> idea... >>>>>> >>>>> eXit :) >>>> >>>> In some languages... >>>> >>>> More important to me is the "the Abort manual input" which tells what = it >>>> does but not why the user would want to do that. >>>> >>>> Abort manual input... and then what? =A0Hang? =A0Retry? =A0Panic? =A0R= eboot? Resume >>>> attempting to mount the root device that was expected? >>> >> well, panic, there isn't much other thing to do. At the very least, >> letting the user input something is still better than what Linux do, >> which is to panic. >> >>> Or just go back to status quo for previous releases and we can worry >>> about usability later? >>> >> which status-quo ? the mountroot procedure of 7 is broken as well, as >> I found out yesterday. So what ? 6 ? 5 ? 4 ? > > =A0 =A0The status quo that I was thinking of was press enter to get a > list of available devices instead of immediately panicking like the > new bootloader code currently does. As long as that status quo is > restored, I think a lot of existing users will be happy. Otherwise > this discussion could stall and turn into an unnecessary bikeshed. > this discussion should not even have happen, and I'd hope[0] that the next message in this thread is either a new patch, or a revision ID where the stuff is fixed, ie. less talk, more action. Btw, if no action is taken, I do not really care, I'm running my patch and am happy with it. - Arnaud [0]: which is pretty much worthless
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACqU3MW-69H22Sd_a9TLZ3k113TovK5HNM6D1kOUAMzrRBZeMg>