Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 17:44:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> To: Castor Fu <castor@geocast.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cscope now open source -- use it? Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0004231734260.8637-100000@blues.jpj.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10004231210320.8278-100000@marais.sfo.geocast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I set up the cscope port for FreeBSD a while ago, when it was proprietary. > > Now version 13.0 is open source from cscope.sourceforge.net, > but it appears to be an older version than the one which I used for > the port (13.7). There seem to be some bugs which were fixed > in the newer one. > > I could potentially update the port to the current version, but > am not sure whether people would prefer this. > > I'm not sure how much time I'll have for maintaining this if it's > changing rapidly. I see at http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/167/2000/4/0/3633188/ : FROM: David O`Brien DATE: 04/21/2000 09:21:01 SUBJECT: RE: cscope now available under the BSD license On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 11:11:22PM +1000, atrn@zeta.org.au wrote: > While browsing around SourceForge (http://sourceforge.net/) I came > across, Yes, in fact I`ve just about finished updating the port to that code base. It needs a lot of patching, and I`ve already made contact with SCO who wants them from me. This just a HEADS UP to everyone that there is no need to put time in updating the port themselves. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) > Any preferences? If the differences are significant, perhaps there could be two ports, cscope and cscope-bin or something. -- Trevor Johnson http://jpj.net/~trevor/gpgkey.txt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.4.21.0004231734260.8637-100000>